Buy it if: You can't help yourself. A good story is a good story, no matter how ridiculous the premise.
Don't Buy it if: You were a history major or history teacher who finds historical fiction that masquerades as historical fact repugnant.
I know you’re thinking at least one of the following things about this book:
A - How good can it be?
The movie previews look a little ridiculous. Abe Lincoln wielding an ax like a Jedi
warrior amidst a sea of the undead? Pass.
B - OK, well, it’s just another literary farce (love it or
hate it) like Grahame-Smith’s previous Pride
and Prejudice and Zombies
C - Abe Lincoln is killing vampires? Perfect storm of awesome.
And here’s the thing, all of the
above are absolutely true. My caveat: I haven’t seen the movie, so I can’t speak to
the whirly twirly “300-esque” ax
fighting style of our 16th president as depicted on film. But, in terms of eminently readable fiction, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
is a remarkably successful book. Unlike
the author’s previous Pride and Prejudice
and Zombies, which was bogged down by Jane Austen’s dreary (sorry, I
just never got on board with her) prose, the writing style here is neatly in
harmony with its subject matter. Indeed,
it’s surprising how many times you will find yourself trolling Wikipedia
pages in disbelief of how many completely accurate facts, quotes and
historical events
are seamlessly woven into the tale. And
all neatly juxtaposed with a world populated by vampires far less pouty than the Twilight cast.
Allegedly based on a secret diary
kept by Lincoln for the majority of his life, the book is largely narrative
with passages from said journal quoted every few pages. Remarkably, the author apes Lincoln’s style
effectively and apart from the mentions of fangs, the undead and vampire
society, could well have been penned by the erstwhile protagonist himself. Even better are re-imagined contexts which
use real Lincoln quotes to describe the supernatural events told within. All in all, the story neatly sidesteps hokiness
in exchange for elegance, no easy task and a relief to this reader. Stephenie Meyer, take note, please.
That being said, the story itself
is essentially just a clever retelling of history. Those familiar with the Civil War and Lincoln
biographies will be assuaged by the historical accuracies, while those who
dozed through sophomore history may actually learn something. (Though I urge you to please check your facts
before making pleasant small talk at a Washington cocktail party about
Jefferson Davis’ hidden alliance with the vampire underworld.) While Grahame-Smith may not replace Gore
Vidal as the former president’s most laudable biographer, he’s done his due
diligence and this is no ‘hack’ job.
